How Project Assessments Changed the Way We Hire Developers
Our multi-stage screening process means you only meet candidates who are already the right fit. And the project assessment is the step that made all the difference.
There's a frustration we hear from hiring managers all the time: “We interviewed fifteen developers last month. Three made it to the final round. One was decent. We're still looking.”
Hiring developers has always been hard. But the traditional approach (post a job, screen some resumes, run a couple of interviews) burns a huge amount of time and still leaves you guessing. You end up making decisions based on how well someone interviews, not how well they actually build things.
At Talent Teams, we decided to completely rethink this. Instead of handing you a pile of “promising” resumes and letting you figure it out, we built a process that does the hard filtering before a candidate ever reaches your desk.
Five Stages Before You Even Meet Them
Every developer candidate we present has already been through five rounds of evaluation. Not a quick phone screen and a gut feeling, but a structured, deliberate process:
Initial Screening
We start with a real conversation. Not just about skills, but about what the candidate is looking for, what drives them, and whether their career goals actually line up with what you're offering. This catches misalignment early and saves everyone's time.
Online Assessment
Candidates take a structured technical assessment covering fundamentals: problem solving, logic, core language proficiency. No trick questions. The point is to establish a solid baseline of technical competence.
Project Assessment
This is where it gets real. Candidates work on a practical project, the kind of thing they'd actually be doing on the job. We look at how they structure code, handle edge cases, make design decisions, and explain their thinking. This one step filters out more bad matches than anything else in the pipeline.
Technical Interview
Our technical interviewers do a deep-dive session with the candidate. This isn't a generic Q&A. It's built around their project submission. We dig into their decisions, test their understanding, and see how they think on their feet.
Final Review & Presentation
Only after clearing every stage does a candidate make it to your shortlist. At this point, you're not screening. You're choosing between genuinely strong options.
Why the Project Assessment Is the Game Changer
Out of all five stages, the project assessment is the one that completely changed our success rate. The reason is simple: it's nearly impossible to fake.
A resume can be polished. An online test can be crammed for. Even interviews can be rehearsed. But when you hand someone a real problem and ask them to build a solution, with their own code structure, their own design choices, their own documentation, you see exactly who they are as an engineer.
We design these assessments to mirror actual work. They're scoped so they can be completed in a reasonable timeframe, but they're complex enough to show how someone thinks about architecture, error handling, code quality, and user experience. There's no single “right answer,” which is exactly the point. We're testing judgment, not memorization.
What This Means for You
Here's the biggest shift: by the time you sit down with a candidate we've sent over, the hard work is done. You're not wondering if they can code. You're not guessing about their technical depth. You already know they can build, they can think, and they've been evaluated by people who understand the bar you're looking for.
Your interview gets to be what it should be: a conversation about fit, ambition, and whether this person is someone you want on your team. Not a technical audit.
We've watched hiring managers go from interviewing ten people to find one decent hire, to interviewing three and struggling to pick because all three are strong. That's what a rigorous upstream process does.
The Bottom Line
Most recruitment firms hand you a stack of resumes and wish you luck. We hand you two or three candidates who have already proven they can do the job. Picking at that point isn't hard. It's almost a formality.
If you've been burned by developer hires who looked great on paper but couldn't deliver when it mattered, maybe the problem isn't your hiring process. Maybe it's the process that happens before candidates ever get to you.
Tired of interviewing candidates who can't deliver?
Our process means you only meet developers who have already proven they can build. Let's talk.
Get in Touch